Link: Arpaio Running Again for Maricopa County Sheriff

link

Fuck.

The “No Comments” Circle-Jerk

blurb

It’s once again the sea­son when the hip­ster­atti regale us poor plebes with the glo­ries of not allow­ing com­ments on their pre­cious blogs.

I get it, not allow­ing com­ments make you feel all hip and edgy — but for the love of sweet Minotaur Jesus stop crow­ing about it like you just dis­cov­ered the fuck­ing secret of N.I.M.H.

Link: On Moderating Expectations for Apple’s 2012

link

Ok kid­dies, I’m back from my two week long ethanol-induced coma — and I fig­ure we’ll get the year started on a pos­i­tive note. To that end, kudos to Chris Rawson at TUAW for speak­ing sense in a great decon­struc­tion of Tim Bajarin’s idi­otic bit of uni­corn fetish porn. The bot­tom line:

Where’s the dis­rup­tive prod­uct, the wave of the future, the thing that makes us feel like Star Trek’s uni­verse has come 300 years early? If it exists at all, it’s prob­a­bly deep within Apple’s labs, in pro­to­type form, and a hell of a lot more excit­ing than any­thing on Bajarin’s list — or mine.

Bingo.

Link: 10 Steps to Better Blogging

link

Dan Frommer with some very good advice for peo­ple who write on the Intartubes. I can’t claim that I always meet these goals with The Angry Drunk, but I sure as shit try.

Consistency

blurb

John Martellaro today regard­ing the inevitabil­ity of Apple pro­duc­ing a 7 inch tablet in response to the Kindle Fire:

It’s just plain rare for a com­pany to sit back and excuse itself out of a mar­ket and poten­tial earnings.

John six days ago regard­ing the future of the Mac Pro:

The Mac Pro will be dis­con­tin­ued. Apple is all into the con­sumer mar­ket, and there’s just no future for this aging, heavy, awk­ward Macintosh. But that’s not to say the Mac mini can’t gain a lot of CPU oomph. I’m expect­ing the Mac mini to grow a lit­tle and get a lot more powerful.

Is it too much to ask for a lit­tle consistency?

Note: This is essen­tially a repost of the com­ment I made at the four mis­an­thropes of the apoc­a­lypse in response to a much more thor­ough drub­bing of this foolishness.

Link: It’s Not ‘Apple TV’ Any More, It’s ‘Siri TV’ … Ugh …

link

Fuck me blind, I’m link­ing to a ZDNet arti­cle. Nonetheless, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes agrees with what all the sane peo­ple are saying:

The prob­lem with all these Apple TV rumors is that no one can come up with a sin­gle com­pelling rea­son why Apple should go into the busi­ness of mak­ing TVs. Sure, it’s easy to pull together tech­nolo­gies like Siri and ARM-based CPUs, then do some hand-waving and come to the con­clu­sion that Apple must be work­ing on TVs but all this ignores the fact that Apple already sells a prod­uct that will con­nect to any TV that hap­pens to have an HDMI con­nec­tor called the AppleTV. What’s more, that prod­uct, even at $99, isn’t exactly set­ting the world alight.

Bingo.

That “uni­corn and sad­dle” metaphor seems awfully famil­iar though.

Link: Definition of An ‘Apple Fanboy’ and Those That Use the Term

link

LOL.

Saddling the Unicorn

Dunce_cap_from_LOC_3c04163u

It seems the “Apple HDTV” has reached the point in the life­cy­cle of an idi­otic Apple prod­uct rumor where the blog­tards really go off the rails and begin to spout “spec­i­fi­ca­tions” for the uni­corn du jour. First we had the grand­pappy of this mis­be­got­ten idea, Gene Munster, spout­ing off at some con­fer­ence that he knew the price of the uni­corn. Next some lack­wit ana­lyst declared that he knew what sizes the uni­corn would come in. Unfortunately this stage of the rumor cycle is unavoid­able. It’s also one of the most infu­ri­at­ing stages; mainly because of the mind-fuckingly stu­pid shit that these magoos come up with.

Which leads us to today’s unfor­tu­nately titled post from John Martellaro at the Mac Observer titled The Operational Details of the Apple HDTV.


Continue read­ing Saddling the Unicorn


Link: Understanding Apple’s Endgame

link

Spot on com­ment by Jim Dalrymple at The Loop:

If Apple enters a mar­ket, I think it knows the prod­uct is dif­fer­ent enough from the begin­ning that oth­ers will follow.

Apple is not moti­vated by the same things that drive other com­pa­nies. Market share and prof­its are a result of mak­ing great prod­ucts. To do that, you can only have that one sin­gu­lar focus.

This isn’t any sort of new con­cept, but it’s one that far too many magoos in the Apple com­men­tary and analy­sis game seem utterly inca­pable of understanding.

Link: Siri Doesn’t Hates Abortions, It Just Hates You

link

Peter Cohen for The Loop:

In what is surely the most ridicu­lous, man­u­fac­tured con­tro­versy in – well, at least 15 min­utes – Apple has been accused of hav­ing a pro-life stance because Siri, the voice-based assis­tant built in to the iPhone 4S, is unable to locate nearby abor­tion clin­ics upon request. I won’t be link­ing to any of the rel­e­vant links, because they’re not worth your time, and I don’t want to give them traffic.

Regardless of my per­sonal and pro­fes­sional rela­tion­ships with Jim and Peter, this is why I love The Loop. They actu­ally under­stand what the job of jour­nal­ism is about. No bull­shit “he said — she said” false equiv­a­lence. The fail­ure to apply crit­i­cal think­ing to a story is the great­est fail­ure of mod­ern so-called “journalism.”