We don’t know exactly how Sony was handling in-app purchases. The predominant speculation is that Sony was using some sort of link to their web-store similar in fashion to the current Kindle app on iOS (although, as Christina Warren of Mashable has pointed out, there is no way to actually purchase a book via Sony’s web front-end ).
Attempting to clarify the situation, Apple reached out to the media. Quoting The Loop:
The Apple media has, for the most part, chosen to interpret this statement to mean that any app that accesses content available from an outside store will be required to offer the same content via in-app purchase or face expulsion from the App Store. I believe that analysis is flawed.
Before laying out my logic, let me state that I have no special knowledge here. I’m working off of the exact same set of fact that the rest of the media is, but I’ve come to a much different conclusion.
any app that accesses outside content may fall afoul of the guidelines, since any content might be monetized.
My suspicion is that, assuming Sony wasn’t doing something utterly stupid link including an embedded store, the problematic action here is including a link to a storefront. By that logic, all Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Zinio and company have to do is to remove the link and let people find their web stores on their own.
within the app.
Until we see some actual action here, something like the Kindle app being pulled from the app store, I think it’s premature to assume that Apple is willing to abandon iPad sales to rabid Amazon customers over the paltry sum that they’d get in eBook revenue.
Pingback: Tweets that mention Of In-App Purchases and Inept Analysis The Angry Drunk -- Topsy.com