Boycott This!

WARNING: Political Content Ahead!

This is a dif­fi­cult post to write. On the one hand, I vehe­mently oppose Arizona Senate Bill 1070; the so-called “immi­gra­tion law.” The law is noth­ing more than a patently trans­par­ent attempt by the right-wing to whip up sup­port amongst the racists here in order to make gains in this year’s elec­tions. It’s the Southern Strategy for a new cen­tury. On the other hand, I’m bemused by the spate of groups who have taken it upon them­selves to pun­ish Arizona by boy­cotting or can­cel­ing events here. Take, for exam­ple, the recent deci­sion by Hall and Oates to can­cel their Arizona dates as part of a “Sound Strike”.

What irks me about these calls to boy­cott has noth­ing to do with any sort of loy­alty to this gods-forsaken state. Nor do I base my crit­i­cism in the stan­dard right-wing canard that enter­tain­ers should not voice their polit­i­cal opin­ions. What angers me is the rank hypocrisy of many who have jumped to denounce us white dev­ils here in the desert.

Hypocrisy, you say, what­ever can you mean by that?

What I mean is this: Two years ago the vot­ers of California approved a vile and big­oted mea­sure known as Proposition 8, which stripped the right to marry from homo­sex­u­als. As an aside I’ll note that, unlike Prop 8, AZ SB 1070 was not approved by the peo­ple of Arizona, it was the prod­uct of our State Legislature. When CA Prop. 8 passed there was a great out­cry from the Left; there were even calls for boy­cotts. So, I sup­pose that us hon­keys in Arizona should take com­fort in the fact that California is being pun­ished along with Arizona by these artists of conscience.

…Oh wait, they’re not.

Take, for instance the par­tic­i­pants in the Sound Strike linked above. Many of them, includ­ing those lords of mag­nif­i­cent hair Hall and Oates, are play­ing events in the queer-hating state of California. Where is your social con­science now boys? Or do you just like bean­ers more than faggots?

Or, could it be that it’s just more con­ve­nient to boy­cott Arizona. California is where the money’s at, after all. How much really is skip­ping a date in Arizona going to impact your pocket book? Besides, it’s like a thou­sand fuck­ing degrees here right now.

Let me reit­er­ate, and make this as crystal-clear as I can. I do not sup­port AZ SB 1070. As an actual res­i­dent of this state, I will do every­thing in my power to see it’s ulti­mate repeal or inval­i­da­tion via the courts. Bigotry; be it racism, sex­ism, homo­pho­bia or any other form is intol­er­a­ble. However, these boy­cotts serve no other pur­pose than to act as pain­less way for the enti­tled and elite to feign social consciousness.

Activism, when per­formed only when con­ve­nient, is worth­less. The hypocrisy on dis­play by those call­ing for boy­cotts of Arizona, while turn­ing a blind eye to the big­otry of the peo­ple of California, does noth­ing more than inflame the pas­sions of the right-wing in Arizona. I expect that the Arizona Republican Party will be send­ing Hall and Oates a nice fruit bas­ket thank­ing them for the support.

  • bkhar­mony

    You pretty much said it: peo­ple hate queers more than Mexicans. I don’t know why. They just do.

    Now Mexi-homos.… that’s a whole ‘nother thing.

  • Benito

    I hope that every American, regard­less of where he lives, will stop and exam­ine his con­science about this and other related inci­dents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and back­grounds. It was founded on the prin­ci­ple that all men are cre­ated equal, and that the rights of every man are dimin­ished when the rights of one man are threat­ened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his chil­dren to be treated, but this is not the case.

    I know the pro­po­nents of this law say that the major­ity approves of this law, but the major­ity is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we lis­ten to the major­ity of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, hous­ing, restau­rants, hotels, retail stores, schools, col­leges and yes water foun­tains) if we lis­ten to the major­ity of the day? We all know the answer, a resound­ing, NO!

    Today we are com­mit­ted to a world­wide strug­gle to pro­mote and pro­tect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domes­tic cri­sis men of good will and gen­eros­ity should be able to unite regard­less of party or pol­i­tics and do what is right, not what is just pop­u­lar with the major­ity. Some men com­pre­hend dis­crim­i­na­tion by never have expe­ri­enc­ing it in their lives, but the major­ity will only under­stand after it hap­pens to them.

  • http://www.theangrydrunk.com The Angry Drunk

    I sus­pect that you are cor­rect that peo­ple are more tol­er­ant of homo­pho­bia than they are of racism. I also sus­pect that the aver­age bigot would be more accept­ing of a black man in a posi­tion of author­ity ver­sus a white woman (sadly our recent oppor­tu­nity to test this hypoth­e­sis was inval­i­dated by the mind-searing idiocy of the female can­di­date).

    However, in the case of these boy­cotts, I really do think that the cal­cu­lus is purely mer­ce­nary. There is sim­ply far too much money on the table in California to risk alien­at­ing the pop­u­lous there. Arizona how­ever is a finan­cially insignif­i­cant target.

  • http://www.theangrydrunk.com The Angry Drunk

    Well said Benito.

  • http://twitter.com/hal_hildebrand Hal Hildebrand

    I think the major issue has to do with busi­ness. Businesses and Government enti­ties — munic­i­pal, regional and state — are behind the bite in the boy­cott. Sadly, indi­vid­u­als — except on a rather mas­sive scale — don’t really make a dent on stuff. But you start accu­mu­lat­ing even a frac­tion of busi­ness and viola, you have a bona fide boy­cott.

    Given that Latinos are a huge — and grow­ing! — polit­i­cal and per­haps more impor­tantly eco­nomic force, it’s hardly a sur­prise that busi­ness and gov­ern­ment enti­ties (i.e. politi­cians) are scram­bling to show some boy­cott love for Latinos. Kicking gays and les­bians around may be mod­er­ately less PC these days, but they aren’t — as they say — a huge eco­nomic or polit­i­cal force.

    Sadly, the world is not fair and never will be as far as I’m con­cerned. Expecting peo­ple to act ratio­nally is the mark of insan­ity. Or lib­er­tar­i­ans. Same thing.

  • http://www.theangrydrunk.com The Angry Drunk

    Hal, It’s not about expect­ing peo­ple to be ratio­nal, lords know that’s not going to hap­pen. It’s about call­ing out the hypocrisy. That said, we’re in agree­ment. The ratio­nal behind pun­ish­ing Arizona rather than California is all about money rather than social justice.

  • Jojo123

    What I don’t get about this whole Arizona thing is … these immi­grants are obvi­ously work­ing for SOMEbody. So why isn’t there any­thing being said or done about the places hir­ing them? Isn’t that who they should be work­ing on if this really is the prob­lem they say it is?

  • http://www.theangrydrunk.com The Angry Drunk

    We can’t be going after the employ­ers, their the ones donat­ing to the GOP. Like I said in the post, none of this is really about pre­vent­ing ille­gal immi­gra­tion, it’s a purely polit­i­cal stunt geared to appeal to the closet (and not-so-closet) racists in Arizona.

  • http://friendfeed.com/infodriveway Jonathan Holbert

    It’s still accept­able to hate TEH GHEY, but it’s totally not cool to fuck with the other minorities.

  • http://friendfeed.com/infodriveway Jonathan Holbert

    It’s still accept­able to hate TEH GHEY, but it’s totally not cool to fuck with the other minorities.