Case in Point

No sooner do I com­ment on the overly cred­u­lous com­men­tary being offered up by the techno-sphere regard­ing the ChromeOS announce­ment than I notice this wretchedly mis-titled arti­cle over at TechCrunch: “Google Is Keeping Chrome OS Simple. Maybe Too Simple.

Now, to be fair, this is Erick Schonfeld, and his deep abid­ing love of the Google-cock is well doc­u­mented, so I shouldn’t be sur­prised. But quotes like this really take things to a new level:

Rather than sup­port Android apps and other sorts of apps, there is only one kind of app Google is inter­ested in: the Web app. Chrome OS is all about mak­ing Web apps the only apps you will ever need. Which kind of makes you won­der how long we’ll need Android apps, or iPhone apps for that mat­ter, because you know it is only a mat­ter of time before a phone comes out run­ning on Chrome OS.

Seriously, Chrome web apps are now going to erad­i­cate stand­alone Android or iPhone apps? The same web apps that Steve Jobs pro­posed two years ago and was widely, and rightly derided over? Web apps cer­tainly have their place, but to even sug­gest that a phone run­ning noth­ing but a web browser could even vaguely com­pete with native appli­ca­tions, be they Android or iPhone is laughable.

But this is Google we’re talk­ing about. I’m hon­estly wait­ing for some “analy­sis” claim­ing that Google can warp the laws of physics. Maybe they can start by walk­ing on water.

  • http://twitter.com/dssstrkl Paul Ward

    Wake me up when Google claims that they wrote and com­piled Chrome OS using Chrome OS. Those of us who aren’t dip­shit blog­gers still need our com­put­ers to do real work. Try run­ning a fuck­ing DNA ampli­fi­ca­tion from a com­puter run­ning a fuck­ing web app some time.

  • Schuler Bob

    “The OS will sup­port only a lim­ited num­ber of Google-blessed devices and periph­er­als, which is Google’s way of ensur­ing reli­a­bil­ity and secu­rity. “

    (http://​arstech​nica​.com/​o​p​e​n​-​s​o​u​r​c​e​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​9​/11…)

    Draconian! Draconian!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Matt-Stocum/10505280 Matt Stocum

    This all feels very Microsoftish, in that it seems that Google has two entirely sep­a­rate OS divi­sions that just plain aren’t talk­ing to each other and don’t have a con­sis­tent mes­sage. We have native apps on our cell phones, which, in the­ory, have always on inter­net con­nec­tions, but are sup­posed to rely only on web apps on our com­put­ers, which may or may not have an inter­net con­nec­tion. If there was a plat­form where I’d expect this to work, it would be a cell phone, and I still remem­ber the col­lec­tive groan when Steve said web apps were good enough.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Matt-Stocum/10505280 Matt Stocum

    I’m really curi­ous how print­ing is going to work. Or are we not sup­posed to print doc­u­ments any­more, since every­thing lives in THE CLOUD?

  • Sigivald

    Do you, uh, read your own blog?

    Because, these back­grounds, with the thin black text over them?

    Not so good for the legibility.

  • http://www.theangrydrunk.com The Angry Drunk

    I’m play­ing with some designs…deal with it.