http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/ Delivering Enlightenment to the Masses, One Blunt Force Trauma at a Time. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1971 indiana61 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:13:52 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1971 <p>Let's face it, sucking cock sucks! I don't like but my wife does, she lets me watch all the time!</p> Let’s face it, sucking cock sucks! I don’t like but my wife does, she lets me watch all the time!

]]> http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1970 Bryan Payne Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:09:15 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1970 <p>You have to love the comments to the post. All sucking iLounge and Jeremy's cock. I posted a comment that disagreed with some of what he said, and it was removed. I briefly saw some other commenters complaining about getting their comments removed as well, so it looks like iLounge is just removing all comments disagreeing with them. Awesome.</p> You have to love the comments to the post. All sucking iLounge and Jeremy’s cock. I posted a comment that disagreed with some of what he said, and it was removed. I briefly saw some other commenters complaining about getting their comments removed as well, so it looks like iLounge is just removing all comments disagreeing with them. Awesome.

]]> http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1969 bkharmony Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:34:27 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1969 <p>The only thing I can't figure out is why anyone takes iLounge seriously.<br><br>There was a point, about the time the 3G iPod came out, where there was burgeoning interest in these new products, but the traditional media - and even established Apple sites - really didn't cater to that interest. The vacuum was filled by shit sites like iLounge, iPod Observer and iPod Garage (iProng, WTF-ever) which have taken off not because they offer anything valuable, but because they got in on the ground floor and a new generation of Apple product buyers unknowingly accepted them as legitimate.</p> The only thing I can’t figure out is why anyone takes iLounge seriously.

There was a point, about the time the 3G iPod came out, where there was burgeoning interest in these new products, but the traditional media — and even established Apple sites — really didn’t cater to that interest. The vacuum was filled by shit sites like iLounge, iPod Observer and iPod Garage (iProng, WTF-ever) which have taken off not because they offer anything valuable, but because they got in on the ground floor and a new generation of Apple product buyers unknowingly accepted them as legitimate.

]]> http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1968 indiana61 Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:08:23 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1968 <p>J.H! What a cunt!</p> J.H! What a cunt!

]]> http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1967 The Angry Drunk Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:32:09 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1967 <p>I've long since stopped trying to figure out what Jeremy's beef with Apple it. I think it has to do with the fact that Steve Jobs doesn't personally notify him about each product launch. It's basically MacMac entitletardetry and New Media Douchebaggery taken to the extreme.</p> I’ve long since stopped trying to figure out what Jeremy’s beef with Apple it. I think it has to do with the fact that Steve Jobs doesn’t personally notify him about each product launch. It’s basically MacMac entitletardetry and New Media Douchebaggery taken to the extreme.

]]> http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2009/06/18/douchelounge/comment-page-1/#comment-1966 Matt Stocum Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:56:45 +0000 http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=1040#comment-1966 <p>Was there a point to that, or was he just masturbating? Is he just mad that Apple doesn't consider ilounge to have real journalists worthy of getting review units?<br><br>Also, Apple does bulk ship iPods, just only in fixed quantities. I think nanos are bulked shipped in increments of 12, 9 is a number less than 12, so that's why they got 9 boxes instead of 1. But why bother with research?</p> Was there a point to that, or was he just masturbating? Is he just mad that Apple doesn’t consider ilounge to have real journalists worthy of getting review units?

Also, Apple does bulk ship iPods, just only in fixed quantities. I think nanos are bulked shipped in increments of 12, 9 is a number less than 12, so that’s why they got 9 boxes instead of 1. But why bother with research?

]]>