Comments on: Michael Arrington: “I’m a Click-Whoring Jackass”

By: JayMan

JayMan — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:11:46 +0000

God, I’m so sick of this shit! You read an article because of the headline and you find out, “well, that’s not what REALLY happened, or that’s not what he REALLY said.”

Reminds me of this doof: Vista screams past XP in gaming tests! http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=458

Fuckin sick of it!

Thank you for letting me vent, I think I’m better now…cheers!

By: JayMan

JayMan — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:11:00 +0000

God, I’m so sick of this shit! You read an article because of the headline and you find out, “well, that’s not what REALLY happened, or that’s not what he REALLY said.”

Reminds me of this doof: Vista screams past XP in gaming tests! http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=458

Fuckin sick of it!

Thank you for letting me vent, I think I’m better now…cheers!

By: drunkard

drunkard — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:55:42 +0000

The mighty arrington's young boy asses has arrived, behold in amazement as they wink their assholes for top serp.

By: drunkard

drunkard — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:55:00 +0000

The mighty arrington's young boy asses has arrived, behold in amazement as they wink their assholes for top serp.

By: Urpapa

Urpapa — Sat, 31 May 2008 05:37:23 +0000

fu*k You all!

By: Urpapa

Urpapa — Sat, 31 May 2008 05:37:00 +0000

fu*k You all!

By: noah

noah — Fri, 30 May 2008 17:00:45 +0000

not sure what his point is of bashing the jain guy from infospace or the twitter developer. yes, i know traffic but to publicly humiliate doesn't seem so hot.

By: noah

noah — Fri, 30 May 2008 17:00:00 +0000

not sure what his point is of bashing the jain guy from infospace or the twitter developer. yes, i know traffic but to publicly humiliate doesn't seem so hot.

By: Andre

Andre — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:29:08 +0000

John. This is not my fight, nor am I interested, but since you asked: "See if you can find a grammatical error in this.."

You probably meant to say: "The Angry Drunk, you're a fuck*ng food whore..."

'Your' implies ownership, you're is a contraction of 'you are'. Don't be sad, it's a very common mistake amongst the poorly educated rabble.

Notice how I managed to point out your grammatical education short-comings without having to refer to a single body part? Neat, no?

By: Andre

Andre — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:29:00 +0000

John. This is not my fight, nor am I interested, but since you asked: "See if you can find a grammatical error in this.."

You probably meant to say: "The Angry Drunk, you're a fuck*ng food whore..."

'Your' implies ownership, you're is a contraction of 'you are'. Don't be sad, it's a very common mistake amongst the poorly educated rabble.

Notice how I managed to point out your grammatical education short-comings without having to refer to a single body part? Neat, no?