<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh for the Love of God!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/</link>
	<description>Delivering Enlightenment to the Masses, One Blunt Force Trauma at a Time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medela metro bag</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Medela metro bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting read, thanks for posting, bookmarking it, will surely be back again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Debra&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, thanks for posting, bookmarking it, will surely be back again.<br /><br />Debra</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this is all a big fuss about nothing. However, opt-out is the tactic of the spammer. Just sayin&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this is all a big fuss about nothing. However, opt-out is the tactic of the spammer. Just sayin’.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-3427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, this is all a big fuss about nothing. However, opt-out is the tactic of the spammer. Just sayin&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this is all a big fuss about nothing. However, opt-out is the tactic of the spammer. Just sayin’.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heart_Man_2000</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Heart_Man_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t understand all the fuss. If you don&#039;t want Apple software on your Windows machine, don&#039;t install it in the first place. It&#039;s called freedom of choice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t understand all the fuss. If you don’t want Apple software on your Windows machine, don’t install it in the first place. It’s called freedom of choice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heart_Man_2000</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>Heart_Man_2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t understand all the fuss. If you don&#039;t want Apple software on your Windows machine, don&#039;t install it in the first place. It&#039;s called freedom of choice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t understand all the fuss. If you don’t want Apple software on your Windows machine, don’t install it in the first place. It’s called freedom of choice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Asa isn&#039;t whining about Apple doing exactly what he asked for -- he originally asked to have Apple make new software more clear (they did now), &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; to have the box unchecked by default.  Apple did part of what he originally wanted: now he&#039;s saying &quot;good job, but please don&#039;t stop there.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a pretty simple issue.  If you&#039;re using something to update existing software, that&#039;s what it should do.  If it&#039;s going to offer to install &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; software, fine -- but users should have to accept the new software if they want it, not reject it if they don&#039;t.  Google Apps does this very right, Apple doesn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And yes, Firefox has some default behaviors that are unfortunate as well (&quot;always check&quot; should default to off, and the initial &quot;set me as default?&quot; dialog should have &quot;Yes&quot;, &quot;No&quot;, and &quot;No, and don&#039;t ask me again&quot; as choices ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The question here isn&#039;t whether someone else in the browser market is doing a better job than Apple, the point is that Apple is doing something that undermines users&#039; trust in software updaters.   If people don&#039;t trust their updaters not to give them new software, they&#039;ll just turn them off, thus leaving security holes all over the place -- and that&#039;s worse for us all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asa isn’t whining about Apple doing exactly what he asked for — he originally asked to have Apple make new software more clear (they did now), <em>and</em> to have the box unchecked by default.  Apple did part of what he originally wanted: now he’s saying “good job, but please don’t stop there.”</p>

<p>It’s a pretty simple issue.  If you’re using something to update existing software, that’s what it should do.  If it’s going to offer to install <em>new</em> software, fine — but users should have to accept the new software if they want it, not reject it if they don’t.  Google Apps does this very right, Apple doesn’t.</p>

<p>And yes, Firefox has some default behaviors that are unfortunate as well (“always check” should default to off, and the initial “set me as default?” dialog should have “Yes”, “No”, and “No, and don’t ask me again” as choices ).</p>

<p>The question here isn’t whether someone else in the browser market is doing a better job than Apple, the point is that Apple is doing something that undermines users’ trust in software updaters.   If people don’t trust their updaters not to give them new software, they’ll just turn them off, thus leaving security holes all over the place — and that’s worse for us all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Asa isn&#039;t whining about Apple doing exactly what he asked for -- he originally asked to have Apple make new software more clear (they did now), &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; to have the box unchecked by default.  Apple did part of what he originally wanted: now he&#039;s saying &quot;good job, but please don&#039;t stop there.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a pretty simple issue.  If you&#039;re using something to update existing software, that&#039;s what it should do.  If it&#039;s going to offer to install &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; software, fine -- but users should have to accept the new software if they want it, not reject it if they don&#039;t.  Google Apps does this very right, Apple doesn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And yes, Firefox has some default behaviors that are unfortunate as well (&quot;always check&quot; should default to off, and the initial &quot;set me as default?&quot; dialog should have &quot;Yes&quot;, &quot;No&quot;, and &quot;No, and don&#039;t ask me again&quot; as choices ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The question here isn&#039;t whether someone else in the browser market is doing a better job than Apple, the point is that Apple is doing something that undermines users&#039; trust in software updaters.   If people don&#039;t trust their updaters not to give them new software, they&#039;ll just turn them off, thus leaving security holes all over the place -- and that&#039;s worse for us all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asa isn’t whining about Apple doing exactly what he asked for — he originally asked to have Apple make new software more clear (they did now), <em>and</em> to have the box unchecked by default.  Apple did part of what he originally wanted: now he’s saying “good job, but please don’t stop there.”</p>

<p>It’s a pretty simple issue.  If you’re using something to update existing software, that’s what it should do.  If it’s going to offer to install <em>new</em> software, fine — but users should have to accept the new software if they want it, not reject it if they don’t.  Google Apps does this very right, Apple doesn’t.</p>

<p>And yes, Firefox has some default behaviors that are unfortunate as well (“always check” should default to off, and the initial “set me as default?” dialog should have “Yes”, “No”, and “No, and don’t ask me again” as choices ).</p>

<p>The question here isn’t whether someone else in the browser market is doing a better job than Apple, the point is that Apple is doing something that undermines users’ trust in software updaters.   If people don’t trust their updaters not to give them new software, they’ll just turn them off, thus leaving security holes all over the place — and that’s worse for us all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecab</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>joecab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-309</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Paranoid little me says this was Apple&#039;s plan all along, because if they started off by offering Safari in the update window as an alternative, people would bitch and moan about that as well, and they&#039;d have no lesser evil to go back to aside from removing it all together. You can&#039;t ever underestimate the public&#039;s ability for misplaced indignation and stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paranoid little me says this was Apple’s plan all along, because if they started off by offering Safari in the update window as an alternative, people would bitch and moan about that as well, and they’d have no lesser evil to go back to aside from removing it all together. You can’t ever underestimate the public’s ability for misplaced indignation and stupidity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joecab</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator>joecab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-3424</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Paranoid little me says this was Apple&#039;s plan all along, because if they started off by offering Safari in the update window as an alternative, people would bitch and moan about that as well, and they&#039;d have no lesser evil to go back to aside from removing it all together. You can&#039;t ever underestimate the public&#039;s ability for misplaced indignation and stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paranoid little me says this was Apple’s plan all along, because if they started off by offering Safari in the update window as an alternative, people would bitch and moan about that as well, and they’d have no lesser evil to go back to aside from removing it all together. You can’t ever underestimate the public’s ability for misplaced indignation and stupidity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josef</title>
		<link>http://www.theangrydrunk.com/2008/04/18/oh-for-the-love-of-god/comment-page-3/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>josef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theangrydrunk.com/?p=152#comment-308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Step 1. Read of Asa&#039;s comment on Daring Fireball
Step 2. Check Darby&#039;s counterpoint, also via Daring Fireball.
Step 3. Read comments. (Cheeks hurt from laughing so hard.)
Step 4. Fall in love with this blog and wonder where it&#039;s been all my life.
Off to spelunk the Angry Drunk for more gems!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step 1. Read of Asa’s comment on Daring Fireball
Step 2. Check Darby’s counterpoint, also via Daring Fireball.
Step 3. Read comments. (Cheeks hurt from laughing so hard.)
Step 4. Fall in love with this blog and wonder where it’s been all my life.
Off to spelunk the Angry Drunk for more gems!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

